Original Article

Combined Use of Retraction and Torque Arch with Mini-Screws: A Cephalometric Study
  • Mihri Amasyalı
  • Fidan Alakuş Sabuncuoğlu
  • Şeniz Karaçay
  • Mehmet Doğru
  • Handan Altuğ
Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 1-6 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17031
The Surgical Predictability of Maxillary Advancement and Impaction in Le Fort I Osteotomy
  • Sıdıka Sinem Soydan
  • Çağla Şar
  • Ayça Arman-Özçırpıcı
  • Sina Uçkan
Turk J Orthod 2013; 26: 1-6 DOI: 10.13076/j.tjo.2013.26.01_1
Evaluation of Class III Malocclusions Through Coben Cephalometric Analysis
  • Mustafa Ülgen
  • Cengiz Yolalan
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 1-6 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.1
Evaluation of Airway Measurements in Class II Patients Following Functional Treatment
  • Merve Göymen
  • Dler Mourad
  • Ayşegül Güleç
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 6-10 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18050
Occlusal Plane Changes After Molar Distalization With a Pendulum Appliance in Growing Patients with Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Cephalometric Study
  • Marco Serafin
  • Rosamaria Fastuca
  • Elisabetta Castellani
  • Alberto Caprioglio
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 10-17 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20050
Longıtudinal Evaluation Of The Predıctıon Of Mandıbular Growth Rotatıon
  • Dilek Erdem
  • Ufuk Toygar Memikoğlu
  • Erhan Özdiler
  • Serhat Özsoy
  • Ensar Başpınar
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 10-17 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-10
Two Different Modeling Techniques for Fabrication and Application of Bone-Borne Symphysis Distractor
  • Toros Alcan
  • Süreyya Sönmez-Aydın
  • Bekir Baysal
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 11-20 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-1-11
The Comparıson Of The Cephalometrıc Measurements Of Chıldren And Adult Indıvıduals
  • Erdal Deniz
  • Ümit Gazilerli
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 21-32 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-2-21
Effect of Experience and Fatigue on Cephalometric Measurement Errors
  • Ali Altuğ Bıçakçı
  • Burcu Koçoğlu
  • Hasan Babacan
Turk J Orthod 2007; 20: 25-34 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-20-1-25
Cephalometric Evaluation of Molar Distalization by a Compact RPE Screw Combined with a Modified Nance Appliance
  • Mazen Al Masry
  • Toros Alcan
  • Cenk Ceylanoğlu
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 27-38 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-1-27
“Upper Lip Response To Upper Incısor Retractıon; Comparıson Of Two Soft Tıssue Predıctıon Technıques In Growıng Patıents”
  • Oktay Üner
  • Emel Yücel Eroğlu
Turk J Orthod 1991; 4: 32-39 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-4-1-32
The Investıgatıon Of Pre And Posttreatment Cephalometrıc Measurements Of The Subjects Treated By Edgewıse Technıoue
  • Abdulvahit Erdem
  • Erdal Deniz
  • İsmail Ceylan
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 32-38 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-32
Correlation Between Cephalometric Values and Soft Tissue Profile in Class I and Class II Adult Patients based on Vertical Patterns
  • Philippe Farha
  • Sarah Abu Arqub
  • Mona Sayegh Ghoussoub
Turk J Orthod 2024; 37: 36-43 DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.20 PMID:38556951
The Relatıonshıps Between Some Cephalometrıc Measurements And The Increments In Skeletal Age, Heıght, And Weıght In The Chıldren Aged 10—11 Years
  • Abdulvahit Erdem
  • Ümit Gazilerli
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 37-46 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-37
Comparıson Of Dıfferent Cephalometrıc Measurements In Dıagnosıs Of Vertıcal Growth Pattern
  • Nazan Küçükkeleş
  • Sibel Biren
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 44-50 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-44
Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Compared With Class I Subjects
  • Halise Aydemir
  • Ufuk Toygar-Memikoğlu
Turk J Orthod 2014; 27: 46-50 DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00004
The Evaluatıon Of The Upper And Upper-Lower Fırst Premolars Extractıon Alternatıves For Class Iı, 1 Malocclusıons' Treatment
  • Ali S. Gültan
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 56-62 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-2-56
Does Gender Have an Effect on Craniofacial Measurements?
  • Lale Taner
  • Gamze Metin Gürsoy
  • Fatma Deniz Uzuner
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 59-64 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18031
Errors In Cephalometrıc Measurements
  • Enis Güray
  • Metin Orhan
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 62-65 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-1-62
Wıts Appraısal
  • Ümit Gazilerli
Turk J Orthod 1991; 4: 62-66 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-4-1-62
Study Of Effects Of Cervıcal Headgear On Cranıofacıal Structures In Treatment Of Dental And Skeletal Class I Anomalıes
  • Semra Şahin Özer
  • Jalan Devecioğlu Kama
  • Sedat Baran
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 2001; 14: 68-72 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-14-2-68
The Evaluatıon Of The Symphysıs And The Soft Tıssues In Dıfferent Age Groups Of Class Iı Dıvısıon 1 Gırls
  • Semra Şahin Özer
  • Seher Gündüz Arslan
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 2001; 14: 73-80 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-14-2-73
Predıctıon Of Mandıbular Growth Rotatıon
  • Haluk İşeri
  • Ayşegül Köklü
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 73-80 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-73
Cephalometric Analysis of the Effect of Upper Incisor Inclination To the Position of A Point
  • Nejat Erverdi
  • Türker Sandallı
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 75-79 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.75
A Cephalometric Comparısıon Of Skeletal Profile And Soft Tıssue Profıle On Adults Wıth Normal Occlusıon
  • Emel Seren
Turk J Orthod 1990; 3: 78-84 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-3-1-78
“A Cephalometrıc Analysıs Based On The True Vertıcal And The True Horızontal”
  • Emel Yücel Eroğlu
Turk J Orthod 1992; 5: 79-91 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-5-2-79
The Changes In Orthodontıc Area After Retentıon Perıod In Skeletal Class 2 Cases Treated Wıth Actıvator
  • Oktay Üner
  • Ali S. Gültan
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 81-91 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-81
Cephalometric Evaluation of Turkish Children With Class III Malocclusion in the Mixed Dentition
  • Ahmet Arif Celebi
  • Enes Tan
  • Ibrahim Erhan Gelgor
  • Tugba Colak
Turk J Orthod 2013; 26: 85-91 DOI: 10.13076/j.tjo.2013.26.02_85
Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and OnyxCeph™ Dental Software Measurements on Cephalometric Radiography
  • Elif İzgi
  • Filiz Namdar Pekiner
Turk J Orthod 2019; 32: 87-95 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2019.18038
Influence of Lateral Cephalometric Radiography on Treatment Planning and Preferences in Skeletal Open-Bite Patients: Do Lateral Cephalograms Influence Treatment Planning?
  • Irina Stupar
  • Enver Yetkiner
  • Thomas Attin
  • Rengin Attin
Turk J Orthod 2016; 29: 87-90 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1609
Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network-Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Detection
  • Mehmet Uğurlu
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 94-100 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.22026
Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application and Computer-Based Imaging Software: A Comparative Study
  • Vinay Kumar Chugh
  • Navleen Kaur Bhatia
  • Dipti Shastri
  • Sam Prasanth Shankar
  • Surjit Singh
  • Rinkle Sardana
Turk J Orthod 2023; 36: 94-100 DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.60 PMID:37346006
Reliability Assessment of Orthodontic Apps for Cephalometrics
  • Sertaç Aksakallı
  • Hilal Yılancı
  • Erhan Görükmez
  • Sabri İlhan Ramoğlu
Turk J Orthod 2016; 29: 98-102 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.1618
Cephalometrıc Investıgatıon Of The Treatment Changes Of The Skeletal Class Iı Malocclusıons Wıth The Ma.R.S. (Mandibular Advancing Repositioning Splint) Applıance
  • Didem Dalaman Güner
  • Müyesser Saraç
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 98-107 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-98
The Changes İn Angle Kl. II/1 Malocclusions İn Long Term Duration
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 99-108 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.99
Turkish Norms of McNamara’s Cephalometric Analysis
  • Halise Aydemir
  • Zaur Novruzov
  • Ufuk Toygar-Memikoğlu
Turk J Orthod 2014; 27: 100-105 DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-14-00017
“A Comparıson Of Soft Tıssue Profıle Confıguratıon In Deep Overbıte And Normal Occlusıon Cases”
  • Murat Özbek
  • Haluk İşeri
Turk J Orthod 1994; 7: 100-118 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-7-2-100
Cephalometric Variables Prediction from Lateral Photographs Between Different Skeletal Patterns Using Regression Artificial Neural Networks
  • Saif Mauwafak Ali
  • Hayder Fadhil Saloom
  • Mohammed Ali Tawfeeq
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 101-111 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21087
Delaıre's Archıtectural And Structural Cranıo-Facıal Analysıs In Cephalometric Evaluatıon
  • Servet Doğan
  • Nazmi Ertürk
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 103-113 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-1-103
Cephalometric Comparison of Two Old Anatolian Peoples With The Contemporary Others
  • İlter Uzel
  • Ali Gültan
  • Osman Bengi
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 109-114 DOI: 10.13076/1200-3500-1.1.109
The Effects Of Vertıcal Headgear Therapy On The Morphology Of Cranıofacıal Structures
  • Haluk İşeri
  • Erhan Özdiler
Turk J Orthod 1992; 5: 111-116 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-5-2-111
Investigation of Skeletal and Dental Cephalometric Changes Occurring with Edgewıse Technique in Individuals with Extraction Class Ii Part 1 Malocclusion
  • Aynur Medine Şahin Sağlam
Turk J Orthod 1998; 11: 112-121 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-11-2-112
The Evaluatıon Of Cranıofacıal Structures In Conganıtal Unılateral Aural Atresıas
  • Deniz Sağdıç
  • Osman Bengi
  • Murat Demirhanoğlu
  • Hüseyin Ölmez
  • Mustafa Gerek
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 117-120 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-1-117
Evaluation of the Relationship Between Mandibular Plane Angle and Craniofacial Morphology in the Mixed Dentition Period
  • Hakan Türkkahraman
  • M. Özgü Sayın
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 123-129 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-2-123
The Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Dentoalveolar Effects Of The Begg Technıque
  • Mehmet Özgen
  • Semra Ciğer
Turk J Orthod 1993; 6: 127-133 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-6-2-127
Effects of Orthodontic Camouflage Treatment on Dentofacial Structures of Young Adult Females with Class II Malocclusion
  • Bülent Baydaş
  • Esengül Ulukaya
  • İsmail Ceylan
Turk J Orthod 2005; 18: 131-143 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-18-2-131
Comparison of the Accuracy of Manual and Digital Cephalometric Prediction Methods in Orthognathic Surgical Planning: A Pilot Study
  • Can Arslan
  • Ayşe Tuba Altuğ
  • Tülin Ufuk Toygar Memikoğlu
  • Elif Merve Arslan
  • Ensar Başpınar
Turk J Orthod 2018; 31: 133-138 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17058
Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings
  • Pamir Meriç
  • Julia Naoumova
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 142-149 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20062
Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion
  • Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus
  • Burak Kale
Turk J Orthod 2021; 34: 155-162 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20103
Facıal Morphology In Sagıttal Components Of Skeletal Open Bıte
  • Mirzen Arat
  • Haluk İşeri
  • Verda İşeri
Turk J Orthod 1996; 9: 155-162 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-9-2-155
A Statıstıcal Evaluatıon Of The Rıcketts Shortrange Fore Castıng Method From A Longıtudınal Sample
  • Dilek Erdem
  • Erhan Özdiler
  • Melike Uysal
  • Banu Erdoğan
  • Arzu Okul
Turk J Orthod 1992; 5: 158-163 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-5-2-158
Evaluation Of The Position Of Lower İncisors By Different Cephalometric Analysis
  • Seda Haydar
  • Bülent Haydar
Turk J Orthod 1999; 12: 162-169 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-12-3-162
Craniofacial Evaluation of Class I Turkish Adults: Bimler Analysis
  • Candan Okay Türkdönmez
  • Lale Taner
  • F. Deniz Uzuner
  • Kahraman Güngör
Turk J Orthod 2013; 26: 169-176 DOI: 10.13076/TJO-D-13-00015
Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles
  • Hasan Camcı
  • Farhad Salmanpour
Turk J Orthod 2020; 33: 171-176 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20017
A Cephalometrıc Study Of The Soft-Tıssue Changes Resultıng From The Orthodontıc Treatment Wıth Extractıons
  • Adnan Günnar
  • İsmail Ceylan
  • Muzaffer Gülyurt
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 172-181 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-2-172
The Evaluatıon Of Upper Aırway Space In Adult Populatıon
  • Ergun Yücel
  • Emel Yücel-Eroğlu
  • Tamer Türk
  • Salih Saraçgil
Turk J Orthod 2000; 13: 179-188 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-13-3-179
The Study Of The Factors Affectıng Anb Angle
  • Ümit Gazilerli
  • İsmail Ceylan
Turk J Orthod 1995; 8: 182-186 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-8-2-182
Landmark Identıfıcatıon Errors And Reasons In Cephalometrıc Analysıs
  • Türker Sandallı
  • Uğur Bilgiç
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 187-190 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-1-2-187
Cephalometric Mandibular Dimensions in Growing Turkish Children: Trends of Change, Sex-Specific Differences, and Comparisons with Published Norms
  • Hande Pamukçu
  • Nilüfer İrem Tunçer
  • İsmail Can Pelin
  • Hatice Yağmur Zengin
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 198-206 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21083
Changes In The Inclınatıon Of The Occlusal Plane Wıth Begg Technıque Treatment In Deep Bıte Cases
  • Mirzen Arat
  • Ayşegül Köklü
  • Erhan Özdiler
  • Haluk İşeri
Turk J Orthod 1988; 1: 199-203 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-1-2-199
The Effect Of Cervıcal Headgear On The Cant Of Occlusal Plane
  • Ali S. Gültan
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 209-214 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-209
Comparison of Cephalometric Changes on Skeletodental Structures by the Mini-Maxillary Protraction Appliance and Delaire Type Face Mask
  • Zahir Altuğ
  • Hatice Gökalp
  • Ayşegül Dalkıran
Turk J Orthod 2007; 20: 212-227 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-20-3-212
Cephalometric Evaluation of Skeletal and Dental Effects of Modified Facemask
  • Amjad Al Taki
  • Toros Alcan
  • Korkmaz Sayınsu
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 219-234 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-3-219
In Thıs Study, It Was Investıgated That, Whether The Fr-3 Applıance Was Adequate Or Not In Functional Ortopedic Therapy
  • Osman Bengi
  • İlter Uzel
  • Yalçın Işımer
  • Deniz Sağdıç
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 238-247 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-238
Cephalometric Variability Among Siblings: A Pilot Study
  • Katharine L. Marcks
  • Yihong Zhao
  • Melih Motro
  • Leslie A. Will
Turk J Orthod 2022; 35: 239-247 DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21237
Accuracy of a Computer Software in Short Term Growth Prediction
  • Önder Kızıldağ
  • M. Serdar Toroğlu
  • Mustafa Kayalıoğlu
  • İlter Uzel
Turk J Orthod 2006; 19: 241-251 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-19-3-241
The Comparıson Of The Frontal Sınus Area Wıth Cephalometrıc Measurements In Anomalous Groups
  • Jalan Kama
  • Mehmet Ali Yeşil
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 1998; 11: 247-256 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-11-3-247
“The Investıgatıon Of The Vertıcal Varıatıons In The Anterıor Regıon Of Class Iı, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıons Treated Wıth Dıfferent Technıques”
  • Orhan Hamamcı
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 248-253 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-248
The Evaluatıon Of Some Reference Planes Used In Cephalometrıc Researches: A Methodologıc Study
Turk J Orthod 1989; 2: 267-273 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-2-2-267

Research

Cephalometric Evaluation of The Patients with Osas: Uvulo-Glossophareyngeal And Cervico-Craniofacial Skeletally Morphology
  • Sıla Mermut Gökçe
  • Serkan Görgülü
  • Hasan Suat Gökçe
  • Ali Osman Bengi
  • Timur Akçam
Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 3-20 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-1-3
A Comparison of Conventional and Computerized Cephalometric Methods
  • Mevlüt Çelikoğlu
  • Doğan Kılkış
Turk J Orthod 2012; 25: 105-112 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-25-2-105
Cephalometric Morphology of Turkish Children with Class II Malocclusion
  • Bengisu Akarsu
  • İlken Kocadereli
Turk J Orthod 2010; 23: 123-135 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-23-2-123

Review

Hıstorıcal Perspectıve And Current Status Of Cranıofacıal Imagıng In Orthodontıcs
  • Elif İdil Keser
  • İlken Kocadereli
Turk J Orthod 2004; 17: 116-125 DOI: 10.13076/1300-3550-17-1-116